?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

This is the best analysis of why the Conservative movement in the USA has withered as champion of individual freedoms, degenerated into lunacy, and, frankly, supported evil over the past ten or so years. It's time for all people who live in the reality-based world to fight back, not try to pacify them. As with Hitler (see, I'm using one of their straw-men!), appeasement does not help them accept reality, it only lengthens their leashes, and if a mad dog has a long-enough leash, it'll break free. Then how comfortable are you with granting them their crazy? One of the reasons the US Progressive movement has been so flaccid is that it's all about finding consensus, touchy-feely love-ins where we all get along. Guess what? Given the chance, those you're trying to appease will slap your "let's all get along" ass in Guantanamo.

It's also greatly reassuring to see that someone of Hari's mental caliber recognizes how the Republican's contemptible warping of religious faith is complicit in the corruption of Conservatism. "Faith-based reality" is not the real world, so it's easy to manipulate folks who blindly follow whatever they are told. It's disgusting.

Lj-cut here and there to shorten your F-list, so be sure to read the whole thing under the cut. Emphases are mine.


The Republican Party Is Turning Into a Cult
By Johann Hari in the Huffington Post.

Something strange has happened in America in the nine months since Barack Obama was elected. It has best been summarized by the comedian Bill Maher: "The Democrats have moved to the right, and the Republicans have moved to a mental hospital."

The election of Obama - a center-left black man - as a successor to George W. Bush has scrambled the core American right's view of their country. In their gut, they saw the US as a white-skinned, right-wing nation forever shaped like Sarah Palin. When this image was repudiated by a majority of Americans in a massive landslide, it simply didn't compute. How could this have happened? How could the cry of "Drill, baby, drill" have been beaten by a supposedly big government black guy? So a streak that has always been there in the American right's world-view - to deny reality, and argue against a demonic phantasm of their own creation - has swollen. Now it is all they can see.

Since Obama's rise, the US right has been skipping frantically from one fantasy to another, like a person in the throes of a mental breakdown. It started when they claimed he was a secret Muslim, and - at the same time - that he was a member of a black nationalist church that hated white people. Then, once these arguments were rejected and Obama won, they began to argue he was born in Kenya and secretly smuggled into the United States as a baby, and the Hawaiian authorities conspired to fake his US birth certificate. So he is ineligible to rule and the office of President should pass to... the Republican runner-up, John McCain.

These aren't fringe phenomena: a Research 2000 poll found that a majority of Republicans and Southerners say Obama wasn't born in the US, or aren't sure. A steady steam of Republican congressmen have been jabbering that Obama has "questions to answer." No amount of hard evidence - here's his birth certificate, here's a picture of his mother heavily pregnant in Hawaii, here's the announcement of his birth in the local Hawaiian paper - can pierce this conviction.

This trend has reached its apotheosis this summer with the Republican Party claiming en masse that Obama wants to set up "death panels" to euthanize the old and disabled. Yes: Sarah Palin really has claimed - with a straight face - that Barack Obama wants to kill her baby.

You have to admire the audacity of the right. Here's what's actually happening. The US is the only major industrialized country that does not provide regular healthcare to all its citizens. Instead, they are required to provide for themselves - and just under 50 million people can't afford the insurance. As a result, 18,000 US citizens die every year needlessly, because they can't access the care they require. That's equivalent to six 9/11s, every year, year on year. Yet the Republicans have accused the Democrats who are trying to stop all this death by extending healthcare of being "killers" - and they have successfully managed to put them on the defensive.

The Republicans want to defend the existing system, not least because they are given massive sums of money by the private medical firms who benefit from the deadly status quo. But they can't do so honestly: some 70 percent of Americans say it is "immoral" to retain a medical system that doesn't cover all citizens. So they have to invent lies to make any life-saving extension of healthcare sound depraved.

A few months ago, a recent board member for several private health corporations called Betsy McCaughey noticed a clause in the proposed healthcare legislation that would pay for old people to see a doctor and write a living will. They could stipulate when (if at all) they would like to be withdrawn. It's totally voluntary. Many people want it: I know I wouldn't want to be kept alive for a few extra months if I was only going to be in agony and unable to speak. But McCaughey started the rumor that this was a form of euthanasia, where old people would be forced to agree to death. This was then stretched somehow to include the disabled. It was flatly untrue - but the right had their talking point, Palin declared the system "downright evil", and they were off.

It's been amazingly successful. Now, every conversation about healthcare has to begin with a Democrat explaining at great length that, no, they are not in favor of killing the elderly - while Republicans get away with defending a status quo that kills 18,000 people a year. The hypocrisy was startling: when Sarah Palin was Governor of Alaska, she encouraged citizens there to take out living wills. Almost all the Republicans leading the charge against "death panels" have voted for living wills in the past. But the lie has done its work: a confetti of distractions has been thrown up, and support is leaking away from the plan that would save lives.

These claims have become so detached from reality that they often seem like black comedy. The right-wing magazine US Investors' Daily claimed that if Steven Hawking had been British, he would have been allowed to die at birth by its "socialist" healthcare system. Hawking responded with a polite cough that he is British, and "I wouldn't be here without the NHS." Frank Laffer, the right-wing economist lauded by David Cameron, claimed on CNN that it would be a disaster if the government got its hands on Medicare, the program providing healthcare for the elderly, paid for entirely by... the government.

This tendency to simply deny inconvenient facts and invent a fantasy-world isn't new; it's only becoming more heightened. It ran through the Bush years like a dash of bourbon in water. When it became clear Saddam Hussein had no Weapons of Mass Destruction, the US right simply claimed they had been shipped to Syria. When the scientific evidence for man-made global warming became unanswerable, they claimed, as one Republican congressman put it, that it was "the greatest hoax in human history", and all the world's climatologists were "liars". The American media then presents itself as an umpire between "the rival sides", as if they both had evidence behind them.

It's a shame, because there are some areas in which a conservative philosophy - reminding us of the limits of grand human schemes, and advising caution - could be a useful corrective. But that's not these what so-called "conservatives" are providing: instead, they are pumping up a hysterical fantasy, that is only a thin skin covering raw economic interests and base prejudices.

For many of the people at the top, this is mere cynical manipulation: one of Bush's former advisors, David Kuo, has said the President and Karl Rove would mock evangelicals as "nuts" as soon as they left the Oval Office. But the ordinary Republican base believe it. They are being cruelly manipulated into opposing their own interests through false fears and invented demons. Last week, one of the Republicans sent to disrupt a healthcare town hall started a fight and was injured - and then complained he had no health insurance. I didn't laugh; I wanted to weep.

Indeed, if you spend any time with American right-wingers - as I have, reporting undercover on events like the National Review cruise and the Christian Coalition Solidarity Tour of Israel - you soon find that your arguments don't center on philosophy. You have to concentrate on correcting basic factual errors about the real world.

They insist Europe has fallen to Islam, since Muslims immigrants are becoming a majority and are imposing sharia law. In reality, Muslims make up 3 percent of the population of Europe, and most of them oppose sharia law. They insist Franklin Roosevelt caused the Great Depression, and should have cut government spending. In reality, whenever he did cut spending - as he tried periodically throughout the 1930s - the economy began to tank. But explain this patiently - with a thousand sources - and they simply shriek that you are lying, and they know "in their heart" what is true. They insist gay marriage would cause the institution of the family to collapse. In reality, where it has already been introduced in Europe, heterosexual families continue just as before. On the list goes: evolution is a lie, a blastocyst is akin to a baby, torture produces actionable intelligence...

How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality? It begins, I suspect, with religion. They are taught from a young age that it is good to have "faith" - which is, by definition, a belief without any evidence to back it up. You don't have "faith" Australia exists, or fire burns: you have evidence. You only need "faith" to believe the untrue or unprovable. Indeed, they are taught that faith is the highest aspiration and most noble cause. Is it any surprise this then percolates into their political views? Faith-based thinking spreads and contaminates the rational.

Up to now, Obama has not responded well to this onslaught of unreason. He has tried to conciliate the elite economic interests, and joke about the fanatical fringe they are stirring up. He has shamefully assured the pharmaceutical companies that an expanded healthcare system will not use the power of government as a purchaser to bargain down drug prices, while wryly saying that he "doesn't want to kill Grandma." Rather than challenging these hard interests and bizarre fantasies aggressively, he has tried to flatter and soothe them. His healthcare plan is weaker and harder to explain as a result.

But this kind of mania can't be co-opted: it can only by over-ruled. Sometimes in politics you will have enemies, and they must be democratically defeated. The political system cannot be gummed up by a need to reach out to the maddest people with the maddest fears. There is no way to expand healthcare without angering Big Pharma and the Republicaloons. So be it. As Arianna Huffington put it, "It is as though, at the height of the civil rights movement, you thought you had to bring together Martin Luther King and George Wallace and make them agree. It's not how change happens."

However strange it seems, the Republican Party really is spinning off into a bizarro-cult who believe Barack Obama is a baby-killer plotting to build death panels for the grannies of America. Their new slogan should be - shrill, baby, shrill.

Comments

( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
clevermanka
Aug. 21st, 2009 07:25 pm (UTC)
Did you see this? Funny and depressing (rather like that article).



I don't always like Rep. Frank's ideas or methods of delivery, but that bit there is just golden.
mckitterick
Aug. 21st, 2009 07:39 pm (UTC)
Barney Frank is my hero.
fortyozspartan
Aug. 21st, 2009 08:11 pm (UTC)
Up to now, Obama has not responded well to this onslaught of unreason. He has tried to conciliate the elite economic interests, and joke about the fanatical fringe they are stirring up. He has shamefully assured the pharmaceutical companies that an expanded healthcare system will not use the power of government as a purchaser to bargain down drug prices, while wryly saying that he "doesn't want to kill Grandma." Rather than challenging these hard interests and bizarre fantasies aggressively, he has tried to flatter and soothe them. His healthcare plan is weaker and harder to explain as a result.

Yep.

I honestly wish the Democrats could get together in a cohesive force and steam roll the Republicans, re: The Bush Administration. Unfortunately, I think the "Blue Dogs" are at least partially to blame.

I have no idea if that made any sense since a second read through yielded no fewer than three spelling errors. Hey, it's Friday afternoon, right?
mckitterick
Aug. 21st, 2009 08:18 pm (UTC)
Yes, I fear you're right: Not only do most Democrats lack spines on things like this, but the frakkin' Blue Dogs are part of the "faith-based reality" problem.
clevermanka
Aug. 21st, 2009 09:26 pm (UTC)
I honestly wish the Democrats could get together in a cohesive force and steam roll the Republicans

ryltar
Aug. 22nd, 2009 05:42 am (UTC)
/sigh

Why can't people think for themselves instead of listening to the slime and other crud that is thrown around... hell, why can't they just play nice in the first place?
mckitterick
Aug. 22nd, 2009 05:15 pm (UTC)
Why indeed.

I'm beginning to wonder if, perhaps, more people than we think are bastards. But I think it's instead that the jerks are louder than the rest, so we notice them more.
victoria_lane
Aug. 22nd, 2009 06:27 am (UTC)
I was starting to think it was just me with regards to the insanity I've been witnessing. I thought maybe it was just my take on it or that I was simply focusing on it more than usual. But it's really happening. And it's really scary.
mckitterick
Aug. 22nd, 2009 05:13 pm (UTC)
Yeah, those are real "fellow Americans" uttering real insanity.
dotar_sojat
Aug. 23rd, 2009 06:49 pm (UTC)
I like to think that the comical actions of the right are the death throes of a political movement... but sometimes I fear that they are the birth pangs of a new, far more bizarre and blunt politcial party intent on power any way they can get it.

Silly political fringe parties were pretty funny to me until I read some things about the start of the Spanish civil war.
mckitterick
Aug. 23rd, 2009 07:35 pm (UTC)
Good points....
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

April 2019
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Comments

Powered by LiveJournal.com